Fraction «Harmony» has approached the President Egila Levita, with the request not to preach the Saeima 30.

Amendments to the Electricity Market Act (ETL) as approved in January and put them back in the second review of the Saeima, so that the law is subject to appropriate changes to ensure the achievement of the objectives for which the law was generally created, promising that the entire company of Latvia would finally be able to organise the state aid system and provide adequate monitoring. This bill started its progress Still in the fall of 2018. Unfortunately, in the course of its review, that bill had been substantially modified, owing to the fact that the ' EM-driven proposals ', which were designed for the purpose of the bill and, in the context of this objective, make the bill almost meaningless. In essence, such a draft law, as it is finalised, will not prevent the further implementation of the OIK AFF (which was originally the objective of the bill, and the promises made by all the Parliament's elected representatives to the Latvian public), but would give it the opportunity to create a new cover for this pledge, now strengthening it with the force of law. This will lead to further legal consequences and many millions of losses for the Latvian economy, which could be eliminated. The request to the President has given specific and reasoned reasons why and what direct legal provisions are to be reassessable in order to remedy the situation. The ' reconciliation ' group considers that it was long possible to ensure that in order to ensure that the aid scheme is fair, proportionate and in keeping with the interests of society as a whole and not just a narrow group of people who, in many cases, have made and continue to benefit in an unlawful manner through the existing situation, and the institutions responsible for supervising and establishing the system still cover those illegal transactions (although it has been proved by real facts – multiple) These amendments will not be made to the public. From a national perspective, it is important that this aid scheme is appropriate not only for the public interest but also in line with the provisions of European Union law and the decision of the European Commission (SA. 43140 (2015/NN), because otherwise such an aid scheme can be declared unlawful and this can lead to sound litigation risks for the country from the support payer and the institutions of the European Union The FM representative also rightly stated in the course of the review of the bill. These risks have so far been glossed over and not sufficiently appreciated. " All Latvian society has to hope that, in this situation, the President of the country will act responsibly and competenatically, rather than try to take a politically angled decision guided by the interests of the power coalition, which, unfortunately, has transferred to its voters the promise of the OIK and wants to implement a new one in the OIK Afera "– The MEP Ivars Zariņš, who has submitted this request